<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Appaholic and Inside Facebook</title>
	<atom:link href="http://20bits.com/articles/appaholic-and-inside-facebook/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://20bits.com/articles/appaholic-and-inside-facebook/</link>
	<description>Driven by Data</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 21:50:46 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jesse</title>
		<link>http://20bits.com/articles/appaholic-and-inside-facebook/comment-page-1/#comment-458</link>
		<dc:creator>Jesse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 17:27:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://20bits.com/2007/07/16/appaholic-and-inside-facebook/#comment-458</guid>
		<description>Pedram,

PageRank is a variant of eigenvector centrality but includes some probabilistic factors.

The idea behind eigenvector centrality is that the score of a node is proportional to the sum of the score of the nodes to which it is connected.  That seems roughly equivalent to real-world influence.  If I&#039;m friends with ten Fortune 500 CEOs I&#039;m probably have a large influence, even if they&#039;re my only friends.

I&#039;m sure there are papers out there about this that, like PageRank, add additional factors to take into account features of social networks that aren&#039;t a priori apparent, but I haven&#039;t read any.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pedram,</p>
<p>PageRank is a variant of eigenvector centrality but includes some probabilistic factors.</p>
<p>The idea behind eigenvector centrality is that the score of a node is proportional to the sum of the score of the nodes to which it is connected.  That seems roughly equivalent to real-world influence.  If I&#8217;m friends with ten Fortune 500 CEOs I&#8217;m probably have a large influence, even if they&#8217;re my only friends.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure there are papers out there about this that, like PageRank, add additional factors to take into account features of social networks that aren&#8217;t a priori apparent, but I haven&#8217;t read any.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pedram</title>
		<link>http://20bits.com/articles/appaholic-and-inside-facebook/comment-page-1/#comment-396</link>
		<dc:creator>Pedram</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2007 23:28:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://20bits.com/2007/07/16/appaholic-and-inside-facebook/#comment-396</guid>
		<description>It seems like eigenvector centrality is a clean representation of pagerank. Is it safe to say more central nodes are influencers?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems like eigenvector centrality is a clean representation of pagerank. Is it safe to say more central nodes are influencers?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
